Eliot Borenstein

Borenstein, Eliot - Headshot (02.27.13)

Eliot Borenstein is a Professor of Russian and Slavic Studies and Collegiate Professer at New York University. Educated at Oberlin College (B.A., 1988) and the University of Wisconsin, Madison (M.A., 1989, Ph.D., 1993), Mr. Borenstein was an Assistant Professor at the University of Virginia (1993-95) before taking an appointment at NYU in 1995.

His early publications dealt largely with issues of sexuality and masculinity in Slavic literature. Men Without Women: Masculinity and Revolution in Russian Fiction, 1917-1929 (Duke UP, 2000), which was an outgrowth of his dissertation, won the 2001 award for best book in literature or cultural scholarship from the American Association of Teachers of Slavic and East European Languages.

Mr. Borenstein’s current research on popular culture is a natural outgrowth of his earlier studies, and his publications are often a melding of the two. Overkill: Sex and Violence in Contemporary Russian Popular Culture (Cornell UP, 2008), which won the award for best book in women’s studies or gender studies from the Association of Women in Slavic Studies, and “Iteration through Innovation: Russian Popular Culture Today,” which he edited with Mark Lipovetsy and Elena Baraban and published in Slavic and East European Journal (48, No. 1 [2004]), are but two examples.   He is currently at work on two projects:  Russia’s Alien Nations: Imagining the Other after Socialism, and Catastrophe of the Week: Apocalyptic Entertainment in Post-Soviet Russia.

Among his many honors are a Mellon Fellowship (1988-90), IREX grants (1997, 2000), NYU’s Goddard Fellowship (1999) and Golden Dozen Teaching Awards (1999, 2005), a Fulbright Fellowship (1999) for study in Moscow, an SSRC Eurasia Fellowship (2002), and a Guggenheim Fellowship (2009).

Articles by Eliot Borenstein

Prigozhin’s Plane, or, Chronicle of a Death Foretold

The Jordan Center stands with all the people of Ukraine, Russia, and the rest of the world who oppose the Russian invasion of Ukraine. See our statement here.

This piece originally appeared on the Cornell University Press Authors’ Blog on 8/25.

Eliot Borenstein is Professor of Russian & Slavic Studies and Interim Vice Chancellor and Vice Provost for Global Programs at New York University.  

In shocking news that shocks no one, Yevgeny Prigozhin, the leader of what looked like an aborted coup by the private mercenary company he led, has apparently died in a mysterious plane crash. So what does this all mean? Or, to put it more awkwardly and more precisely, what is this all going to mean?

When Prigozhin brought the Wagner Group within spitting distance (well, missile distance) of Moscow as part of his “march of justice” in late June of this year, observers were riveted by a spectacle that was a strange cross between Apocalypse Now and Stripes. The Wagner Group was an undeniably murderous, criminal organization that had perpetrated atrocities on at least two continents, but the real-time coverage and social media self-promotion had a bizarre “reality show meets TikTok” feel about it (the Real House-Mercenaries of Voronezh).

After Prigozhin halted his advance, Russia watchers and anti-Putinists found themselves in an uncomfortable position. No reasonable person could harbor any illusions about Prigozhin as a potential liberator of Russia from authoritarianism, and the prospect of armed conflict in Moscow was appalling.  But for a moment, it seemed like Putin’s days might not only be numbered, but numbered in the single digits.

No reasonable person could harbor any illusions about Prigozhin as a potential liberator of Russia from authoritarianism [. . .]

Yet none of this justifies some of the lazy and downright wrong characterizations of Prigozhin by the Western media now that he appears to be safely dead. Witness the New York Post’s August 23 headline:  “Russian Dissident Yevgeny Prigozhin Dead After Plane Crash Outside Moscow: Wagner Group.”  Solzhenitsyn was a dissident. Navalny is a dissident. Prigozhin was nothing of the sort.

Prigozhin had supported Putin from the very beginning, and used his economic and military might to put down rebellions and advance Putinist policy for years. Turning against his former sponsor does not retroactively make him a dissident. It makes him something much more predictable in a personalist, authoritarian system: a member of the power elite who got fed up and tried to take over.

Just days after the airplane disaster, two questions are on everybody’s mind: was this a deliberate assassination, and was Prigohzin actually on the plane? The fact that both these questions can be asked, and also that most people reasonably assume that they can be quite easily answered, is what is most important.

As I demonstrated in Plots against Russia: Conspiracy and Fantasy after Socialism, Russia under Putin has been prone to countless conspiracy theories. As in the rest of the world, most of the outrageous conspiratorial narratives are not state-sponsored, at least initially:  politicians, pundits, intellectuals, and random Internet bloggers develop and spread the often outlandish ideas that can eventually be received as fact. Where things have gotten complicated, and dangerous, is in the state and state media’s appropriation and dissemination of these theories as instruments of disinformation and social control. Putinism thrives on an epistemic uncertainly that facilitates political apathy: no one can determine the truth, and it’s hardly worth the bother to try.

As in the rest of the world, most of the outrageous conspiratorial narratives are not state-sponsored, at least initially:  politicians, pundits, intellectuals, and random Internet bloggers develop and spread the often outlandish ideas that can eventually be received as fact.

The latest, and presumably final, chapter in the Prigozhin saga will fit into this framework perfectly, while also meeting a public appetite for intrigue. Setting aside for a moment the likelihood that a missile or bomb was responsible for downing Prigozhin’s aircraft, it is perfectly possible that a famous person who is in open opposition to Putin might, like anyone, be unlucky enough to die in a plane crash. But everyone is going to assume that Putin’s regime was behind it.  Like the 1999 Moscow apartment bombings that may or may not have been masterminded by Putin’s FSB, it will always exist as two mutually contradictory stories: an improbable accident and a ruthless political murder.

Even if the majority of Russians following the news do believe that Putin was behind it, this is unlikely to have any real effect on his support. Putin’s regime is behaving exactly as everyone would expect; the real surprise was that Prigozhin lived so long.

There is, however, one final twist to the Prigozhin story that is likely to extend it to different, but still familiar territory: what if Prigozhin wasn’t on the plane? As soon as the story broke, reports also questioned whether or not the passenger list was accurate.  In other words, Prigozhin could have had a lucky escape, or even faked his own death.

I will not be at all surprised if, over the next several years, we hear about groups of admirers who are convinced that Prigozhin is still alive, waiting to make his move. There is clear historical precedent, of course:  anyone familiar with the opera, play, or, for that matter, history of Boris Godunov will remember that a pretender marched on Moscow, claiming to be Dmitry, the previous tsar’s dead son who survived an attempted murder masterminded by Russia’s current leader (Godunov). During the Time of Troubles (1598-1613), Russia faced not one, but three such “False Dmitrys.”

Though the Pretender tale is a famously Russian story, it is by no means the exclusive intellectual property of the Russian Federation. Just two years ago, QAnon followers were anxiously awaiting the return of John F. Kennedy, Jr., whose 1999 death (in a plane crash!) was supposed to be a hoax. JFK Jr. never showed, but QAnon cultists are persistent in their faith, as if they were a fascist variation on Linus from Peanuts waiting for a handsome and ripped incarnation of the Great Pumpkin to come prove that their inane beliefs are true.

Prigozhin’s selfies in disguise found during the raid in his hous via FOCUS.UA/ Фокус.

It is too early to say whether any “False Yevgenys” are going to rear their lumpy heads in the coming days, but the Russian Internet recognizes a good thing when it sees one. Among the many memes flying across the ether is a well-known assemblage of photos of Prigozhin wearing six different disguises. The meme is captioned, “Photos of all the passengers on the airplane.”

We have clearly not seen the last of Yevgeny Prigozhin.

Learn more about Soviet Self-Hatred

The Post-Soviet Uncanny (Unstuck in Time)

The uncanny, c’est nous!

Continue reading...

The Future Is Not Yet Written (Unstuck in Time)

I’m making up the introduction as I’m going along

Continue reading...

The Future is Feudal (Unstuck in Time)

The medieval future, far from being always dystopian, might not even be that bad.

Continue reading...

Tomorrow’s Soviet Union Today (Unstuck in Time)

The Soviet conditional subjunctive is the result of a collective act of will

Continue reading...

Quantum Leaps or Quantum Entanglement? (Unstuck in Time)

No one is at all bothered by the idea of paradoxes resulting from the deaths of butterflies, grandfathers, or Hitlers

Continue reading...

Circle Games (Unstuck in Time)

Voting Putin back into the presidency made the equation between past and future more literal

Continue reading...

Time Out of Joint (Unstuck in Time)

The manipulation of Russian historical precedent for present-day political gain is rather clear-cut

Continue reading...

Time of Troubles; or, The Trouble with Time (Unstuck in Time)

The outcome of a Time of Troubles is a foregone conclusion

Continue reading...

Scheduling Conflicts (Unstuck in Time)

On or about December 1991, the normal course of time in Russia stopped.

Continue reading...

New Book, New Blog: Unstuck in Time

Unstuck in Time: On the Post-Soviet Uncanny, will begin serialization on Thursday

Continue reading...

The Problem with Johnson’s Russia List

This is not an antisemitic dogwhistle, it’s an antisemitic cowbell.

Continue reading...

Navalny and the Boxers Rebellion

There is no scenario in which a sentence containing the name “Putin” and the words “Navalny’s underwear” does the president any good.

Continue reading...

The Lincoln Project’s Red Scare

Russia always equals “communism,” even when that equation makes no sense whatsoever

Continue reading...

Forgetting Eduard Limonov: The New York Times’ Obituary Epic Fail

Limonov was most famous for gay sex and supporting Bosnian genocide, neither of which the NYT saw fit to mention

Continue reading...

Rereading Akunin: A Conversation with Eliot Borenstein

Fandorin is just not a joiner. And specifically, if there’s one principle to which he’s committed above all others, it’s this notion of “personal human dignity” and the individual’s prerogative to sequester themselves in their own preferences. Fandorin doesn’t want to work for the Okhranka or for any other part of the Imperial government, which he sees becoming increasingly brutal and unreasonable. He doesn’t want to be with the progressives, either; he just wants to be on his own. And what’s interesting is that, for him, the only path to true independence is to be insanely wealthy. It’s one big libertarian dream.

Continue reading...

The Devil Is No Match for Procedural Liberalism (Pelagia and the White Bulldog (Conclusion))

The rule of law is boring, but necessary

Continue reading...

Pelagia Descending into the Underworld (Pelagia and the White Bulldog 9)

Pelagia impersonates herself

Continue reading...

Brother 2: Son of Brother (Russia’s Alien Nations)

If we say (and show) enough times that there are no more questions that need to be asked about the nature and future of Russia, it will become true

Continue reading...

Brothers and Keepers (Russia’s Alien Nations)

Danila is a dangerous mixed metaphor: an empty vessel and a hired gun. 

Continue reading...